2020-06-172020-06-172020-06-172020-06-10https://ri.ucsal.br/handle/prefix/1578The imminent visa work questions the constitutionality of Brazilian Bullfight and the factors that led or may constitute a reform in the Federal Constitution, recognizing as any cultural manifestation and intangible heritage of Brazil, any and all sports that use animals for their use. So, research in a current scenario, by observing the current legislation and the jurisprudence of the Federal Supreme Court, which, in turn, already had a position contrary to an intended test. Thus, it is understood that a constitutional amendment 96 characterizes a reversal of jurisprudence resulting from an active manifestation of the Legislative Power, or congressional family activism. It also addresses a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality 5728, which is found in the STF, and finds a perspective of this judgment. In this way, the study here presents here the demonstration of the relevance of the animal's capacity for Law, as well as the possibility of declaring Amendment 96 unconstitutional.Acesso AbertoVaquejadaManifestação culturalInconstitucionalidadeDireito animal e backlashBrazilian bullfightCultural manifestationUnconstitutionalityAnimal law and backlashTrabalho de Conclusão de CursoCiências Sociais AplicadasDireito