O ônus da prova no processo do trabalho conforme o CPC/2015
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2021-04-29
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidade Católica do Salvador
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze the burden of proof as a basis in the legal
proceedings that are being processed within the labor sphere, with the specific objective being
highlighted at the time when the principle of searching for the real truth is considered through
the evidence presented, which seeks the result that provides effective application of copyright.
In addition, the discussion of the proposed thesis aims at the main objective of elucidating the
burden of proof in the labor process in the light of the 2015 code of civil procedure. Another
point to be addressed refers to the divergence between art. 818 of the CLT, which imputes the
burden of proof to the party it alleges and art. 373 of the CPC 2015, which assigns responsibilityto the plaintiff to prove the constitutive facts and to the defendant the burden of proof of the
plaintiff's impeding, modifying and extinct facts. Therefore, the method used here is the
qualitative-explanatory based on the comparison between the codes (CPC 2015 and CLT), in
addition to jurisprudential understandings, doctrinal source, TST normative instruction, articles
and the current legislation. In short, based on what is observed in the code of civil procedure of
2015, and taking into account the need to fill the gaps in the work process, this research brings
together several questions and hypotheses such as: "Is the proof really indispensable?", "Is there
a mandatory obligation of one of the parties regarding the production of certain evidence?",
"Does the CPC really bring greater effectiveness to the labor process?". In addition to
fundamentals to answer the research problem: Is it possible to dispense with the application of
the civil procedure code at the time of the investigation of labor lawsuits? With all these
reflections throughout this scientific paper, conclusions will naturally be reached in a way to
assist the jurisdictional provision in a more effective way.
Description
Keywords
Ônus da prova, Código de processo Civil de 2015, Processo do trabalho, Direito autoral, Burden of proof, 2015 Civil procedure code, Work process, Copyright