As decisões judiciais e suas controvérsias na aplicação do(s) direito(s): uma análise acerca da persuasão racional do juiz
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2019-01-23
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidade Catolica de Salvador
Abstract
The current scientific article stems primarily from disparities in
jurisdictional benefits. In principle, it considers the historical evolution of legal
philosophy, demonstrating how theories elucidate the formation of conviction by the
judge, varying according his subjectivity. Thus, the controversies between the law and the verdict are evidenced, and separate legal decisions are brought before the same concrete case. The last one, it communicates the sources of Law in the scope of glimpsing the impacts of judicial decisions in the process, with a fulcrum in the art. 489, § 1° of the New Code of Civil Procedure – NCPC. Therefore, the importance of the legislature in circumventing judicial arbitrariness against the parties is evident. Thus, the objective sought here is to determine the degree to which the Magistrate 's
exacerbated formalism and conservatism can interfere with the delivery of the decision, which falls, directly and immediately, under the life of a jurisdiction.
Description
Keywords
Decisões judiciais, Controle, Persuasão racional, Fundamentação, Judicial decisions, Control, Rational persuasion, Justification